[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPS based on SIM68M chip
From: |
Gary E. Miller |
Subject: |
Re: GPS based on SIM68M chip |
Date: |
Fri, 5 Feb 2021 11:03:45 -0800 |
Yo Nick!
On Fri, 5 Feb 2021 10:34:47 +0000
Nick Taylor <nicktaylor@dataskill.uk> wrote:
> I am working on a project using a custom TI 43xx armhf platform using
> the SIM68M GPS chip:
> https://www.simcom.com/product/SIM68M.html
My condolences. All their doc requires a login, which I do not have.
> Wondering whether someone can confirm the support level of this chip
> within gpsd, from what I gather from Gary Miller, support for multi
> system receivers in gpsd is still being developed.
I can confirm we have never heard of it before. Without documentation
hard to say anything about it. The HTML says it may be an MTK 3333 or
MTK 3337. gpsd has some support for MTK.
> I'm attaching debug log from gpsd -D9 and output from gpspipe in case
> that provides info about the standards used within the SIM68M
Can't tell standards compliance from logs. That requires doc.
I can verify is it NOT working with your gpsd:
gpsd:UNK: Packet type 1 accepted 85 =
$GPGRS,100300.000,1,4.17,-2.23,2.08,9.39,-8.72,4.76,0.48,9.77,-4.48,-1.76,-4.09,*4F\x0d\x0a
gpsd:UNK: Packet discard of 85, chars remaining is 14 = $GPGST
When gpsd has to discard input, that is bad.
> If it will help with development, we may be able to discuss the
> possibility of donating one of our devices to the development team,
> or alternatively financial donation to the cause...
That would be nice.
RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
gem@rellim.com Tel:+1 541 382 8588
Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas?
"If you can't measure it, you can't improve it." - Lord Kelvin
pgpW0FXnEw0dN.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature