[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gpsrinex and Trimble
From: |
Gary E. Miller |
Subject: |
Re: gpsrinex and Trimble |
Date: |
Tue, 5 May 2020 13:22:56 -0700 |
Yo John!
On Tue, 5 May 2020 16:15:06 -0400
John Ackermann N8UR <address@hidden> wrote:
> Well, I was actually able to get TrimbleRTX to accept my F9P RINEX
> file created by gpsrinex.
Good. Someone reported otherwise this week.
> It would *not* accept the one created by
> rtklib's convbin tool -- no useful explanation what was wrong, just
> unrecognized file format.
Those are called "Lassie Errors". Content free.
Does anyone here have Timb;e contacts?
> The bad news is that the results were pretty awful. Since the results
> are just a single-page PDF, I've attached it here. But in summary:
>
> Out of 2873 total observations, 100% were usable, but only 207 (7%)
> were used. That raises a lot more questions than it answers...
No thanks. We already have enough unanswetred questions here. :-)
> The sigmas (not clear if 1 or 2 stdevs) are 0.185m, 0.131m, and 0.066m
> for XYZ, and 0.062m, 0.195m, and 0.130m for lat/lon/height. The
> report came with this warning:
Which are about 10x worse than NRCan.
> Of course, those numbers don't actually appear in the report itself.
Typical Trimble.
RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
address@hidden Tel:+1 541 382 8588
Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas?
"If you can't measure it, you can't improve it." - Lord Kelvin
pgpWb6gZhRfNE.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature