gomp-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gomp-discuss] Question about libgomp ..


From: Steven Bosscher
Subject: Re: [Gomp-discuss] Question about libgomp ..
Date: 29 Jan 2003 14:46:54 +0100

Op wo 29-01-2003, om 14:43 schreef Lars Segerlund:
> 
>   I have some thoughts about libgomp, mainly is libgomp really necessary ?
> 
>   If we generate calls to the thread library in use ( or syscalls for 
> those systems supporting threads ) this might not be necessary.
> 
>   Opinions ?

It would allow the code to split the loops and set up the mutexes to be
shared.  I think that could be a lot of code.  And the time spent in the
library routines would (OK should) be insignificant compared to the time
spent in the loop.  So I think that we should have a libgomp.

Greetz
Steven






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]