[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gomp-discuss] Question about libgomp ..
From: |
Steven Bosscher |
Subject: |
Re: [Gomp-discuss] Question about libgomp .. |
Date: |
29 Jan 2003 14:46:54 +0100 |
Op wo 29-01-2003, om 14:43 schreef Lars Segerlund:
>
> I have some thoughts about libgomp, mainly is libgomp really necessary ?
>
> If we generate calls to the thread library in use ( or syscalls for
> those systems supporting threads ) this might not be necessary.
>
> Opinions ?
It would allow the code to split the loops and set up the mutexes to be
shared. I think that could be a lot of code. And the time spent in the
library routines would (OK should) be insignificant compared to the time
spent in the loop. So I think that we should have a libgomp.
Greetz
Steven