[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [gomd-devel] <DAEMON>: working on the SCX

From: Matthias Rechenburg
Subject: Re: [gomd-devel] <DAEMON>: working on the SCX
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 11:38:46 +0200
User-agent: KMail/1.4.3

Hey JP,

On Donnerstag 11 September 2003 02:46, Gian Paolo Ghilardi wrote:
> Hi all.
> I'm working on the SCX feature.
> Actually I can run a program in a separate process and, finally, I get the
> child output from the main process.
> I've still a problem with the execXX() family of calls. Some programs like
> "ls" work fine but others like "find", not!

no idea yet. how can i test it ? is it already in the cvs ?
.... btw: i changed my mind and now i also think that it would be
nice to support long-running commands if possible  ;))

> BTW: these day I'm busy (studying Economics for an exam (19 Sept)) but,
> when I can, I continue with gomd devel.

have a good exam

> I want to release the beta ASAP.

ok :)

> Byez.
> Johnny: I like pthreads. Commoncpp provides a Thread wrapper class (based
> on pthread, I suppose) but it's not so handy as I'd like it was.
> ATM the code uses standard fork() but I'd like to use threads.

mhmm, ok, which advantages are giving pthreads above forks ?
..... forked procs may even migrate ;) pthreads don't 

> <rejected>
> _______________________________________________
> gomd-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gomd-devel

all the best and many thanks again for all your work,

E-mail  :  address@hidden
www     : http://www.openmosixview.com
an openMosix-cluster management GUI

(A)bort, (R)etry, (T)ake down entire network?

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]