[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [gomd-devel] Agreement on Friday night

From: johnycsh
Subject: Re: [gomd-devel] Agreement on Friday night
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 13:13:07 -0600 (CST)


Heya matt, i think that a getmeanload fuction would be useful but probably
better off in libgomd. Im a bit confused about your remark, one obvious
example of an instance when a 'getallload' call would want to get the
invdividual load of every node is 3dmosmon refreshing its view. You didnt
mean to imply that 'getalload' should jsut return the mean do you?

Best Regards

> > user/GOMD"client": GET ALL LOAD
> > GOMD"server": 1:1000,2:555,3:61,4:565,5:565
> maybe we should just reply the mean load of the whole cluster ?
> like e.g.
> GOMD"server": ALL:445
> or do you want to have this calculation in the libgomd ?
> ........just my thought is that we should have this calculation
> in the gomd because it might slow down GUI applications
> if we have it in the libgomd (imagine a huge cluster)
> > user/GOMD"client": GET 1-4,7 LOAD
> > GOMD"server": 1:1000,2:555,3:61,4:565,7:5651
> usefull, maybe not needed (the ranges). My suggestion is just
> to report all values from all online nodes
> (mean values for the whole cluster).
> To my mind the client application will just need to get one value from
> a special node by request or the mean value for the whole cluster.
> Why do we need the ranges ?

> ( .... there may be a reason for it i did not see yet)

> >
> >
> Many thanks to you all.
> all the best,
> Matt
> --
> E-mail        :  address@hidden
> www   : http://www.openmosixview.com
> an openMosix-cluster management GUI
> A physicist is an atom's way of knowing about atoms.
> _______________________________________________
> gomd-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gomd-devel

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]