[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: guile testsuite failure (gnutls 3.0.1 and later) and armel and mipse
From: |
Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos |
Subject: |
Re: guile testsuite failure (gnutls 3.0.1 and later) and armel and mipsel |
Date: |
Sun, 06 Nov 2011 19:07:50 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.23) Gecko/20111010 Icedove/3.1.15 |
On 11/06/2011 06:07 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Any update on that? Do the observed issue seem related to a gnulib change?
>
> Yes.
>
> The problem is that Guile 1.8 uses off_t fields in its scm_t_port
> structure, which is public [0]. On armv5tel-unknown-linux-gnueabi, that
> structure is 96-byte long when _FILE_OFFSET_BITS == 32, and 120-bit long
> otherwise.
[...]
> Ideally, though, GnuTLS would have a configure check to determine what
> _FILE_OFFSET_BITS value Guile is expecting, but I can’t think of any
> reliable way to do that. Ideas?
How does the size of off_t affect the gnutls-guile code? Which code
does it affect? (could it be written so that it is independent of that
size?)
regards,
Nikos
- Re: guile testsuite failure (gnutls 3.0.1 and later) and armel and mipsel, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos, 2011/11/05
- Re: guile testsuite failure (gnutls 3.0.1 and later) and armel and mipsel, Ludovic Courtès, 2011/11/06
- Re: guile testsuite failure (gnutls 3.0.1 and later) and armel and mipsel,
Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <=
- Re: guile testsuite failure (gnutls 3.0.1 and later) and armel and mipsel, Ludovic Courtès, 2011/11/06
- Re: guile testsuite failure (gnutls 3.0.1 and later) and armel and mipsel, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos, 2011/11/06
- Re: guile testsuite failure (gnutls 3.0.1 and later) and armel and mipsel, Ludovic Courtès, 2011/11/06
- Re: guile testsuite failure (gnutls 3.0.1 and later) and armel and mipsel, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos, 2011/11/06
- Re: guile testsuite failure (gnutls 3.0.1 and later) and armel and mipsel, Andreas Metzler, 2011/11/07
- Re: guile testsuite failure (gnutls 3.0.1 and later) and armel and mipsel, Ludovic Courtès, 2011/11/07
- Re: guile testsuite failure (gnutls 3.0.1 and later) and armel and mipsel, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos, 2011/11/07
Re: guile testsuite failure (gnutls 3.0.1 and later) and armel and mipsel, Andreas Metzler, 2011/11/12