[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] session ticket support
From: |
Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] session ticket support |
Date: |
Tue, 4 Aug 2009 15:38:39 +0300 |
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Simon Josefsson<address@hidden> wrote:
> If we use our own pack/unpack format, it won't be possible to set up TLS
> load-balancing between GnuTLS and some other implementation that accepts
> session tickets on another format. Maybe that is a minor issue, but it
> could come up. Or is there some other reason why that setup would never
> work anyway?
No not really :) Especially since the RFC ticket format is
underdefined (several parts are missing). If there will ever be some
standard format we can switch our internal format and solve that
issue, and in addition our DBs will be readable by others via
memcached etc.
regards,
Nikos
- Re: [PATCH] session ticket support, Simon Josefsson, 2009/08/04
- Re: [PATCH] session ticket support, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos, 2009/08/04
- Re: [PATCH] session ticket support, Daiki Ueno, 2009/08/05
- Re: [PATCH] session ticket support, Simon Josefsson, 2009/08/05
- Re: [PATCH] session ticket support, Daiki Ueno, 2009/08/06
- Re: [PATCH] session ticket support, Simon Josefsson, 2009/08/06
- Re: [PATCH] session ticket support, Daiki Ueno, 2009/08/09
- Re: [PATCH] session ticket support, Simon Josefsson, 2009/08/10