[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gnutls-dev] unencrypted PKCS#12
From: |
Joe Orton |
Subject: |
Re: [gnutls-dev] unencrypted PKCS#12 |
Date: |
Sun, 24 Oct 2004 16:46:28 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 12:12:03AM +0200, Aleix Conchillo Flaque wrote:
> Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Do you use gnutls_pkcs12_bag_get_type()? In that function you must also
> > specify the index of the bag element to check. Certtool makes use of this
> > function and seems to work.
> >
>
> Yes, I use that function which is where I get that the unencrypted
> certificate bag is encrypted.
I think this is right, Aleix: the bags really are encrypted, just using
a zero-length password string. I've adjusted the neon code to verify
the MAC manually in both cases and it passes the load_client_cert tests
with the GnuTLS HEAD at least.
joe
- [gnutls-dev] unencrypted PKCS#12, Aleix Conchillo Flaque, 2004/10/18
- Re: [gnutls-dev] unencrypted PKCS#12, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos, 2004/10/19
- Re: [gnutls-dev] unencrypted PKCS#12, Aleix Conchillo Flaque, 2004/10/19
- Re: [gnutls-dev] unencrypted PKCS#12, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos, 2004/10/19
- Re: [gnutls-dev] unencrypted PKCS#12, Aleix Conchillo Flaque, 2004/10/19
- Re: [gnutls-dev] unencrypted PKCS#12, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos, 2004/10/19
- Re: [gnutls-dev] unencrypted PKCS#12, Joe Orton, 2004/10/19
- [gnutls-dev] Re: unencrypted PKCS#12, Simon Josefsson, 2004/10/24
- Re: [gnutls-dev] Re: unencrypted PKCS#12, Joe Orton, 2004/10/24
- [gnutls-dev] Re: unencrypted PKCS#12, Simon Josefsson, 2004/10/24
- Re: [gnutls-dev] unencrypted PKCS#12,
Joe Orton <=
Re: [gnutls-dev] unencrypted PKCS#12, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos, 2004/10/27