[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Attempting migration from ->

From: Gregory Casamento
Subject: Re: Attempting migration from ->
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2021 00:27:31 -0400

I will take a look at GitHub Actions.  I preferred doing travis ONLY because it seems like a straightforward migration and also because it doesn't tie us to GitHub.

On Fri, Jul 9, 2021 at 9:33 AM David Chisnall <> wrote:
I'd second the suggestion to go with GitHub Actions.  With the vmactions
thing, you can do FreeBSD/OpenBSD/NetBSD/Solaris CI on the free Mac
runners.  It looks as if native FreeBSD support isn't too far away.


On 09/07/2021 09:52, Niels Grewe wrote:
> Hey folks,
> I have no particular knowledge of the travis org/com migration thing. Back when I set upthe CI pipeline, travis-ci was one of the very few options available. Nowadays, I‘d definitely pick Azure Pipelines over travis-ci. But GitHub Actions might be worth looking at if a migration is inevitable. It‘s always shell scripts in a YAML sandwich anyways.
> Best,
> Niels
> --
> Sent on the road
>> Am 09.07.2021 um 10:29 schrieb David Chisnall <>:
>> On 08/07/2021 13:35, Gregory Casamento wrote:
>>> I am seeing the following message when trying to migrate.   David, do you own these configs on travis?
>> I don't think I own (or have ever touched) any of the Travis things. Niels set this up.  For the runtime, I use Azure Pipelines for Windows / Linux / macOS tests, Cirrus CI for FreeBSD.
>> David

Gregory Casamento
GNUstep Lead Developer / OLC, Principal Consultant - - Become a Patron - My GNUstep GoFundMe

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]