[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Development machines
From: |
Armando Di Cianno |
Subject: |
Re: Development machines |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:11:54 -0400 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 2005-07-27 12:29:04 -0400 Adam Fedor <address@hidden> wrote:
I'd like to put together a list of machines that people regularly
test/develop GNUstep on. These would be any machine you have regular
access
to and can provide patches for problems and/or provide sufficient
information
that anyone who does not have access to the machine could fix the
problem.
Just being able to provide a bug report is not typically enough to
make this
list, but you can provide me the names of those machines as well.
A canonical name or something like Debian/i386 would be good.
Gentoo/i686 - pentium-m 2.0Ghz*
Gentoo/i686 - pentium-m 1.6Ghz*
Gentoo/PPC - 1.5Ghz G4
*these were the two machines where libffi works on the 1.6Ghz machine,
and not the 2.0Ghz machine (using ffcall), for no easily discernible
reason.
Core GNUstep ebuilds in Gentoo are also keyworded for amd64 (probably
in 32-bit mode? I have no idea), alpha, and sparc, but this is done by
other Gentoo devs that have the hardware to test. After this, pretty
much the only system I haven't been able to compile and use core
GNUstep on is mips.
__Armando Di Cianno
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1-ecc0.1.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using the GPG bundle for GNUMail
iD8DBQFC5+qKwgiTPLI9xhcRAmOiAJwNaC2aQ8fvKpTKud3VZkdKb1TQFACggqll
Zoy6SmdS0dvfjgTb3EYQGG8=
=GGC3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Development machines, Adam Fedor, 2005/07/27
- Re: Development machines, Aredridel, 2005/07/27
- Re: Development machines,
Armando Di Cianno <=
- Re: Development machines, Quentin Mathé, 2005/07/27
- Re: Development machines, Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf, 2005/07/27
- Re: Development machines, Gürkan Sengün, 2005/07/28
- Re: Development machines, Chris Vetter, 2005/07/28