|
From: | Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf |
Subject: | Re: STS Template Engine |
Date: | Mon, 25 Jul 2005 23:10:10 +0200 |
Am Montag, 25.07.05 um 22:26 Uhr schrieb Helge Hess:
On 25. Jul 2005, at 02:35 Uhr, Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf wrote:Well, my first thought was: why another templating engine? We already have WO (either in SOPE or in gstep-web).maybe because WO would be overkill for some simple tasks (or do you use a semitrailer truck to carry a crate of beer to your home)?Hear hear! ;-)The WO framework just has ~20 public classes and is hardely a truck, its rather a beautifully modular bike: http://developer.apple.com/documentation/LegacyTechnologies/ WebObjects/WebObjects_4.5/System/Library/Frameworks/ WebObjects.framework/ObjC_classic/WebObjectsTOC.html
I wasn't aware that WO was such a lithe and lissom animal once. it has put on a lot weight since then (Java disease?). This: http://developer.apple.com/documentation/WebObjects/Reference/API/ index.html is definitely a truck. (and yeah, you omitted EOF, could you install WO without it those days?)
Stripping down to the classes required for templating you may end up with something like 5-10 classes for text rendering.Greets, Helge
regards, Lars
-- http://docs.opengroupware.org/Members/helge/ OpenGroupware.org _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list address@hidden http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |