[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Release schedule
From: |
Nicola Pero |
Subject: |
Re: Release schedule |
Date: |
Tue, 1 Apr 2003 00:12:32 +0100 (BST) |
> > Perhaps if someone can come up with better wording, then we could agree
> > on a change.
>
> Hmm, how about:
> ""
> The primary goal for core/ is to provide an implementation of the
> FoundationKit and ApplicationKit interfaces of OPENSTEP, which was
> essentially a superset of the OpenStep specification.
>
> OpenStep and OPENSTEP are static today. Apple provides Cocoa, which is
> based on the same interfaces but has numerous additions and changes. It
> is not our goal to track these changes.
This sentence directly upsets an important part of our user base, who *is*
expecting us to track these changes.
- Re: Release schedule, (continued)
- Re: Release schedule, Alexander Malmberg, 2003/03/26
- Re: Release schedule, Tim Harrison, 2003/03/26
- Re: Release schedule, Chris B. Vetter, 2003/03/26
- Re: Release schedule, Adam Fedor, 2003/03/27
- Re: Release schedule, Tobias, 2003/03/28
- Re: Release schedule, Alexander Malmberg, 2003/03/29
- Re: Release schedule, Adam Fedor, 2003/03/29
- Re: Release schedule, Alexander Malmberg, 2003/03/30
- Re: Release schedule, Adam Fedor, 2003/03/31
- Re: Release schedule, Alexander Malmberg, 2003/03/31
- Re: Release schedule,
Nicola Pero <=
- Re: Release schedule, Chris B. Vetter, 2003/03/31
- Re: Release schedule, Nicola Pero, 2003/03/31
- Re: Release schedule, Chris B. Vetter, 2003/03/31
- Re: Release schedule, Tim Harrison, 2003/03/31
- Re: Release schedule, Chris B. Vetter, 2003/03/31
- Re: Release schedule, Nicola Pero, 2003/03/31
- Re: Release schedule, Nicolas Roard, 2003/03/31
- Re: Release schedule, Alexander Malmberg, 2003/03/31
- Re: Release schedule, Adam Fedor, 2003/03/31
Re: Release schedule, Adam Fedor, 2003/03/27