[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Header cleanliness [was: removing the 'make install'-->'makeall'depe
From: |
Nicola Pero |
Subject: |
Re: Header cleanliness [was: removing the 'make install'-->'makeall'dependency] |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Dec 2002 01:25:38 +0000 (GMT) |
> > If we get precompiled headers on GNU, that might become the preferred
> > solution even to cut down compilation time, because usually you will have
> > a precompiled version of Foundation/Foundation.h and of AppKit/AppKit.h,
> > while you will not have precompiled versions of the specific Foundation/*,
> > AppKit/* headers if you include them separately.
>
> Why not?
Good point :-)
I don't know enough about precompiled headers to really answer - but I
heard it's that way on Apple. Maybe they were too lazy to precompile all
headers.
- Re: Problem with autogsdoc and GSFusedSilica.h, (continued)
- Re: Header cleanliness [was: removing the 'make install'-->'makeall' dependency], Alexander Malmberg, 2002/12/16
- Re: Header cleanliness [was: removing the 'makeinstall'-->'makeall' dependency], David Ayers, 2002/12/17
- Re: Header cleanliness [was: removing the 'makeinstall'-->'makeall'dependency], Alexander Malmberg, 2002/12/17
- Re: Header cleanliness [was: removing the 'makeinstall'-->'makeall'dependency], David Ayers, 2002/12/17
- Re: Header cleanliness [was: removing the 'makeinstall'-->'makeall' dependency], Nicola Pero, 2002/12/19
- Re: Header cleanliness [was: removing the 'make install'-->'makeall'dependency], Alexander Malmberg, 2002/12/22
- Re: Header cleanliness [was: removing the 'make install'-->'makeall'dependency],
Nicola Pero <=
- Re: Header cleanliness [was: removing the 'make install'-->'makeall'dependency], Markus Hitter, 2002/12/23