gnunet-svn
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[taler-marketing] branch master updated: fca


From: gnunet
Subject: [taler-marketing] branch master updated: fca
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2022 18:25:22 +0100

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

grothoff pushed a commit to branch master
in repository marketing.

The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
     new e06d96f  fca
e06d96f is described below

commit e06d96f866a59b5182b74d71dec29f24fcf647e1
Author: Christian Grothoff <christian@grothoff.org>
AuthorDate: Fri Jan 28 18:25:20 2022 +0100

    fca
---
 2022-privacy/privacy.tex | 27 +++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/2022-privacy/privacy.tex b/2022-privacy/privacy.tex
index 93850aa..6ea1622 100644
--- a/2022-privacy/privacy.tex
+++ b/2022-privacy/privacy.tex
@@ -270,22 +270,21 @@ Tightly coupling them is thus probably the worst idea to 
entertain in the design
 space for CBDCs but is exactly what is proposed.
 
 Citizens themselves are well aware of this aspect and it consequently would
-have a significant impact on acceptance of a CDBC:
-The Swiss population recently rejected a proposal for a national
-eID~\cite{eid2021}, and the newly elected German government is promising a
-reversal of ubiquitous data retention (without 
cause)~\cite{koalitionsvertrag2021}.
-The European Parliament has members
-proposing to ban the use of facial recognition in public
+have a significant impact on acceptance of a CDBC: The Swiss population
+recently rejected a proposal for a national eID~\cite{eid2021}, and the newly
+elected German government is promising a reversal of ubiquitous data retention
+(without cause)~\cite{koalitionsvertrag2021}.  The European Parliament has
+members proposing to ban the use of facial recognition in public
 spaces~\cite{euai2021}.  The ECB's proposal seemingly ignores the popular
 rejection of treating every citizen as a criminal suspect by doubling down.
-Payment data is already typically retained for 6 or more years.~\cite{fca}
-The missing link in the ECB proposal that would
-reveal the dystopic reality they would invoke would be a statement that facial
-recognition could be used to conveniently establish the payer's identity --- or
-``pay with your smile'', as contemporary account-based digital payment
-offerings already put it.  If CBDC payment data is strongly coupled with our
-identities, those who dislike living in a panopticon could only hope for such a
-CBDC to be rarely used.
+The missing link in the ECB proposal that would reveal the dystopic reality
+they would invoke would be a statement that facial recognition could be used
+to conveniently establish the payer's identity --- or ``pay with your smile'',
+as contemporary account-based digital payment offerings already put it.  If
+CBDC payment data, which like other payment data can be expected to be
+retained for 6 or more years~\cite{fca}, were to be strongly coupled with our
+identities, those who dislike living in a panopticon could only hope for such
+a CBDC to be rarely used.
 
 
 % FIXME This paragraph. It conflates and rambles incoherently with a lot of ()s

-- 
To stop receiving notification emails like this one, please contact
gnunet@gnunet.org.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]