[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[taler-docs] branch master updated: DD18 question

From: gnunet
Subject: [taler-docs] branch master updated: DD18 question
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 19:36:28 +0200

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

dold pushed a commit to branch master
in repository docs.

The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
     new 1226c0d  DD18 question
1226c0d is described below

commit 1226c0dde2a8379f1ec0fad6099357dc3dcb60e5
Author: Florian Dold <>
AuthorDate: Mon Apr 12 19:36:24 2021 +0200

    DD18 question
 design-documents/018-contract-json.rst | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/design-documents/018-contract-json.rst 
index 2bc147b..7c62600 100644
--- a/design-documents/018-contract-json.rst
+++ b/design-documents/018-contract-json.rst
@@ -126,6 +126,9 @@ The hash of a member value ``memb_val`` with salt 
``memb_salt`` is computed as f
      salt: memb_salt,
+When encoding ``memb_salted_hash`` with base32-crockford, the resulting output
+must be upper-case.
@@ -165,3 +168,6 @@ Discussion / Q&A
   forgetting a member.  This would save storage.  But to prove that a certain
   forgettable info matches the contract terms, the prover would need to
   also store/provide the salt.
+* What validations should the wallet do?  Should the wallet ever accept
+  contract terms where fields are already forgotten?

To stop receiving notification emails like this one, please contact

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]