[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[taler-docs] branch master updated: First commit of the translation for
[taler-docs] branch master updated: First commit of the translation for the fee schedule (inserted into subchapter 'discussion')
Mon, 04 Jan 2021 12:34:04 +0100
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
skuegel pushed a commit to branch master
in repository docs.
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
new f2ee48e First commit of the translation for the fee schedule
(inserted into subchapter 'discussion')
f2ee48e is described below
Author: Stefan Kügel <email@example.com>
AuthorDate: Mon Jan 4 12:32:35 2021 +0100
First commit of the translation for the fee schedule (inserted into
design-documents/008-fees.rst | 18 +++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/design-documents/008-fees.rst b/design-documents/008-fees.rst
index 331d6cd..a3d5ca6 100644
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ Design Doc 008: Fee Structure Metrics
-We discuss criterea for evaluating an exchange's denomination and fee
+We discuss criteria for evaluating an exchange's denomination and fee
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ exchange and what it will mean for them. Thus we want to
define some metrics
that allow a user to make more informed decisions.
Similarly, the fee structure metrics might be used by exchange operators
-as a senity check.
+as a sanity check.
An auditor might also enforce ranges on these metrics as a condition for
auditing a denomination structure.
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ Is there a relationship between the smallest denomination and
the size of fees?
Idea: When when only doing spends on a coin that are a multiple of the
smallest spending amount,
we constrain the number of coins that are refreshed into.
-When evaluating the e2e cost of a denomiation, look at:
+When evaluating the e2e cost of a denomination, look at:
* the cost of withdrawing the coin by itself and spending it fully, directly
* the cost of withdrawing the coin, directly refreshing it into the next
fully fitting currency (or use greedy fit!) and add up the withdraw,
refresh and re-withdraw fees.
@@ -118,3 +118,15 @@ Drawbacks
Discussion / Q&A
+The Taler protocol offers the following fee types:
+1. 'Withdrawal': For each successful withdrawal from the checking account, per
+2. 'Deposit': For spending, per coin
+3. 'Refresh': Per coin for
+ a. Refresh transactions for receiving change
+ b. Refresh of coins at the end of their validity
+ c. Abort of transactions due to network failure
+ d. Refund
+4. 'Refund': For refunds or in case of contract cancellation by seller, per
+5. 'Wire fee': For aggregated amounts wired by the Exchange to the merchant's
checking account, per wired transfer
+6. 'Closing': In case that a withdrawal process could not be accomplished (the
users' wallet did not withdraw the value from the reserve), per wired transfer
from the Exchange's escrow account to the account of origin
To stop receiving notification emails like this one, please contact
|[Prev in Thread]
||[Next in Thread]|
- [taler-docs] branch master updated: First commit of the translation for the fee schedule (inserted into subchapter 'discussion'),