gnunet-svn
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[GNUnet-SVN] [gnunet] 11/17: eliminate dead NAT options


From: gnunet
Subject: [GNUnet-SVN] [gnunet] 11/17: eliminate dead NAT options
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2017 21:19:17 +0100

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

grothoff pushed a commit to branch master
in repository gnunet.

commit df3c092ec36c40ffdc1738c4b95dc33725e812e6
Author: Christian Grothoff <address@hidden>
AuthorDate: Mon Jan 9 08:59:53 2017 +0100

    eliminate dead NAT options
---
 src/core/test_core_defaults.conf |  6 ------
 src/nat/nat.conf.in              | 31 +------------------------------
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 36 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/core/test_core_defaults.conf b/src/core/test_core_defaults.conf
index eb9a1c379..4c956987c 100644
--- a/src/core/test_core_defaults.conf
+++ b/src/core/test_core_defaults.conf
@@ -5,13 +5,7 @@
 GNUNET_TEST_HOME = /tmp/test-gnunet-core/
 
 [nat]
-DISABLEV6 = YES
 ENABLE_UPNP = NO
-BEHIND_NAT = NO
-ALLOW_NAT = NO
-INTERNAL_ADDRESS = 127.0.0.1
-EXTERNAL_ADDRESS = 127.0.0.1
-USE_LOCALADDR = NO
 
 [ats]
 WAN_QUOTA_IN = 1 GB
diff --git a/src/nat/nat.conf.in b/src/nat/nat.conf.in
index 88975c424..19d11c2ad 100644
--- a/src/nat/nat.conf.in
+++ b/src/nat/nat.conf.in
@@ -9,42 +9,13 @@ UNIXPATH = $GNUNET_RUNTIME_DIR/gnunet-service-nat.sock
 UNIX_MATCH_UID = YES
 UNIX_MATCH_GID = YES
 
-# Are we behind NAT?
-BEHIND_NAT = NO
-
-# Is the NAT hole-punched?
-PUNCHED_NAT = NO
-
 # Enable UPNP by default?
 ENABLE_UPNP = NO
 
-# Use addresses from the local network interfaces (inluding loopback, but also 
others)
-USE_LOCALADDR = YES
-
-# Use address obtained from a DNS lookup of our hostname
-USE_HOSTNAME = NO
-
-# External IP address of the NAT box (if known); IPv4 dotted-decimal ONLY at 
this time (should allow DynDNS!)
-# normal interface IP address for non-NATed peers; 
-# possibly auto-detected (using UPnP) if possible if not specified
-# EXTERNAL_ADDRESS = 
-
-# Should we use ICMP-based NAT traversal to try connect to NATed peers
-# or, if we are behind NAT, to allow connections to us?
-ENABLE_ICMP_CLIENT = NO
-ENABLE_ICMP_SERVER = NO
-
-# IP address of the interface connected to the NAT box; IPv4 dotted-decimal 
ONLY;
-# normal interface IP address for non-NATed peers; 
-# likely auto-detected (via interface list) if not specified (!)
-# INTERNAL_ADDRESS = 
-
 # Disable IPv6 support
+# FIXME: move entirely to transport plugins!
 DISABLEV6 = NO
 
-# Do we use addresses from localhost address ranges? (::1, 127.0.0.0/8)
-RETURN_LOCAL_ADDRESSES = NO
-
 # How often do we query the DNS resolver
 # for our hostname (to get our own IP)
 HOSTNAME_DNS_FREQUENCY = 20 min

-- 
To stop receiving notification emails like this one, please contact
address@hidden



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]