[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GNUnet-developers] Proposal: Make GNUnet Great Again?
From: |
Schanzenbach, Martin |
Subject: |
Re: [GNUnet-developers] Proposal: Make GNUnet Great Again? |
Date: |
Sun, 10 Feb 2019 11:05:58 +0100 |
My point was that they do it by having a stable API/ABI across major versions.
But they do not check our builds and do not modify our code if they change
major versions.
We have to do that ourselves.
> On 10. Feb 2019, at 11:03, Christian Grothoff <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Signed PGP part
> On 2/10/19 10:50 AM, Schanzenbach, Martin wrote:
>> That is also the point. They should not care. Do you really think
>> Gtk+ devs care if they break API/ABI and gnunet-gtk fails to build?
>
> Yes, they do, and they should.
>
>
>
>
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Proposal: Make GNUnet Great Again?, (continued)
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Proposal: Make GNUnet Great Again?, Hartmut Goebel, 2019/02/11
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Proposal: Make GNUnet Great Again?, Hartmut Goebel, 2019/02/11
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Proposal: Make GNUnet Great Again?, Christian Grothoff, 2019/02/11
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Proposal: Make GNUnet Great Again?, Florian Dold, 2019/02/10
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Proposal: Make GNUnet Great Again?, Schanzenbach, Martin, 2019/02/10
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Proposal: Make GNUnet Great Again?, Christian Grothoff, 2019/02/10
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Proposal: Make GNUnet Great Again?,
Schanzenbach, Martin <=