[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Better-structured narrative output
From: |
Busser, Jim |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Better-structured narrative output |
Date: |
Thu, 1 Dec 2011 23:57:49 +0000 |
On 2011-12-01, at 2:50 PM, Jim Busser wrote:
> The easiest algorithm would identify (at most) a single block of difference,
> wherein the paired strings are compared:
>
> from their beginnings, yielding an anterograde breakpoint
> from their ends, yielding a retrograde breakpoint
>
> and everything in between those points becomes treated as the 'delta'.
which, in a worst case scenario, would involve the new row differing from the
old at both ends (first and last characters), resulting in:
[+ entirety of the new row] [- entirety of the old row]
albeit likely a corner caseā¦ in the more-common case which is of the correction
of spelling, or a word replacement by a more suitable term, or insertion of a
piece of information to make the note more complete, we would be talking a much
shorter string.
-- Jim
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Better-structured narrative output, Busser, Jim, 2011/12/01
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Better-structured narrative output, Busser, Jim, 2011/12/01
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Better-structured narrative output, Karsten Hilbert, 2011/12/01
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Better-structured narrative output, Busser, Jim, 2011/12/01
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Better-structured narrative output, Karsten Hilbert, 2011/12/01
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Better-structured narrative output, Busser, Jim, 2011/12/01
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Better-structured narrative output,
Busser, Jim <=
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Better-structured narrative output, Busser, Jim, 2011/12/01