[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Problem postal code (zip) not null
From: |
Karsten Hilbert |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Problem postal code (zip) not null |
Date: |
Sat, 6 Aug 2011 22:36:38 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Sat, Aug 06, 2011 at 01:09:28PM -0700, Jim Busser wrote:
> > I reddened the labels of the required fields of the generic
> > address edit area.
>
> You were right to recognize that what I was actually after was to improve the
> signalling to the user (by way of labels) prior to an attempted save, instead
> of pinking the fields which is the downstream post-failed-save action.
>
> Would the above capture
>
> "Adding new address" :
>
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnumed-devel/2011-08/pnggeYwV5vlhD.png
That's the generic address edit area, yes, in which, now,
the mandatory field labels are red.
Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ gpg-keyserver.de
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Problem postal code (zip) not null, Rogerio Luz Coelho, 2011/08/02
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Problem postal code (zip) not null, Karsten Hilbert, 2011/08/06
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Problem postal code (zip) not null, Jim Busser, 2011/08/06
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Problem postal code (zip) not null, Jim Busser, 2011/08/06
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Problem postal code (zip) not null, Karsten Hilbert, 2011/08/06
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Problem postal code (zip) not null, Jim Busser, 2011/08/06
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Problem postal code (zip) not null, Karsten Hilbert, 2011/08/06
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Problem postal code (zip) not null, Karsten Hilbert, 2011/08/06
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Problem postal code (zip) not null, Jim Busser, 2011/08/06
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Problem postal code (zip) not null,
Karsten Hilbert <=
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Problem postal code (zip) not null, Karsten Hilbert, 2011/08/06