[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnumed-bugs] Fwd: [Gnumed-devel] GNUmed 1.5.0 Feature Release - inb
From: |
Karsten Hilbert |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnumed-bugs] Fwd: [Gnumed-devel] GNUmed 1.5.0 Feature Release - inbox shows *old* unsigned documents |
Date: |
Thu, 22 Jan 2015 00:04:45 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 10:07:37PM +0000, Jim Busser wrote:
> > What's truly interesting: Did this patient, in fact, have 3
> > unreviewed documents ?
>
> Yes, but the failure to review was not of consequence
> because the documents were simply copies of patient summaries
> that I had generated which got auto-attached at a stage
> before signing was in the same step supported, and I never
> had the occasion to stumble on it because I never again saw
> that patient.
That's good to know at the clinical level.
I was wondering because I couldn't know whether rewriting the
view did have an effect. It seems it did. Which is good at
the technical level.
> >> virtue of this fresh loading of the inbox with virtual items,
> >> rather than the date (oldest or newest) of any of the
> >> documents themselves?
> >
> > For the blink of an eye I considered doing that but it's
> > non-trivial so I figured more pain
>
> A more-accurate column heading than "Sent" might be
> "Created" which would encompass both created (and sent) by a
> person and also auto-generated (which are virtual and not
> really "Sent")
I changed it to "Created". I don't see that much difference, though.
Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ eu.pool.sks-keyservers.net
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346