[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gnugo-devel] Re: snapbacks
From: |
bump |
Subject: |
Re: [gnugo-devel] Re: snapbacks |
Date: |
Sun, 29 Jan 2006 14:36:36 -0800 |
> I don't have a problem with it having a high value since it does solve
> the problems it claims, although only temporarily, but it should be
> valued lower than the effective move, in this case T6. Now it's 29.21
> for Q7 and 28.90 for T6 so a simple workaround would be to add a
> modest negative shape value for playing into snapback. There are,
> however, oddities in the territorial valuation, which maybe should be
> investigated first.
It seems to me that unless it is to make a ko threat,
a snapback capture is never the correct move. This is a
sanity check that is easy to implement reliably. Maybe
after the trymove at value_moves.c:887 one should bail
out if the move is a snapback capture.
Dan