[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [OT], archaicity, Re: Texinfo (was Re: Documentation File Formats)
From: |
S11001001 |
Subject: |
Re: [OT], archaicity, Re: Texinfo (was Re: Documentation File Formats) |
Date: |
Thu, 05 Sep 2002 00:42:55 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1b) Gecko/20020904 |
Derek Neighbors wrote:
Which is why in the end OpenOffice formats will probably be the norm.
They let the writers write and not fuss with learning some 'formatting'
techniques. :)
http://www.gnu.org/manual/texinfo-4.2/html_node/Indicating.html#Indicating
"Texinfo is an intentional formatting language rather than a typesetting
formatting language." (unfortunately, some would abuse the typesetting
commands already in there, but declared properly as macros, the
intention is preserved.)
If OpenOffice formats were better at intentional formatting, they
wouldn't include so many options to easily screw around with fonts,
paragraph spacing, paginating, etc. All that would be separated from the
text. All word processors have this problem (unless you're referring to
some non-word-processing, doc-writing OpenOffice app...); Texinfo at
least allows you to separate the concerns and still generate something
useful.
--
Stephen Compall
DotGNU `Contributor' -- http://dotgnu.org
There were people whose thinking was so simplistic that if they
disapproved of the conduct of the U.S. in Vietnam War, they had to
support the North Vietnamese. They couldn't imagine a more complicated
position, I guess.
-- RMS