|
From: | John Griessen |
Subject: | [Gnucap-devel] git or Fossil? |
Date: | Sun, 28 Apr 2013 08:43:22 -0500 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5 |
On 04/24/2013 10:28 PM, al davis wrote:
It looks like "git" is the choice, but I invite other opinions.
Fossil has some nice features. It's not like git in its assumptions about needing to triage many code offerings from many many developers. It doesn't use the rebase idea of git. It keeps all history in every clone. has web UI for displaying the history and branches. John Griessen
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |