[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: about GNU Hurd
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: about GNU Hurd |
Date: |
Sun, 9 Sep 2007 11:02:51 +0200 (CEST) |
This depends on what issues you are refering to. The two
(semi-serious) problems that Marcus pointed out wrt to passive
translators and firmlinks can be solved. As was pointed out by
Bushenell, and someone else.
I would like to see these solutions.
Could someone please show them to me?
The major problem was that one could use firmlinks to escape a chroot.
The solution to that is to simply not use chroot, and use what was
specifically designed for the task, namley sub-hurds.
The problem with sub-hurd's was that they provided a very secure
enviroment, and that you could not share devices between the sub-hurd
and the currently running system. The purposed solution for that was
to have a special way to selectivley open holes (much like a network
firewall) to the underlying system.
- Re: about GNU Hurd, (continued)
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Xavier Maillard, 2007/09/03
- Re: about GNU Hurd, olafBuddenhagen, 2007/09/05
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Michael Heath, 2007/09/05
- Re: about GNU Hurd, olafBuddenhagen, 2007/09/06
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/07
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/09/06
- Re: about GNU Hurd, olafBuddenhagen, 2007/09/06
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/07
- Re: about GNU Hurd,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/09
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/09/14
- Re: about GNU Hurd, olafBuddenhagen, 2007/09/09
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/10
- Re: about GNU Hurd, olafBuddenhagen, 2007/09/11
Re: about GNU Hurd, Xavier Maillard, 2007/09/12
Re: about GNU Hurd, Xavier Maillard, 2007/09/12