[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: about GNU Hurd
From: |
Xavier Maillard |
Subject: |
Re: about GNU Hurd |
Date: |
Wed, 5 Sep 2007 03:00:23 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Rmail in GNU Emacs 23.0.51.4 on GNU/Linux |
I think the problem people face is: Why work on something that is
already fundamentally obsolete or bad?
GNU Mach is not fundamentally obsolete or bad, I really do not
understand where people get this idea from.
That's what is said about GNU Mach...
Xavier
--
http://www.gnu.org
http://www.april.org
http://www.lolica.org
- Re: about GNU Hurd, (continued)
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/06
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Xavier Maillard, 2007/09/03
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/09/03
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Michael Heath, 2007/09/03
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Filip Brcic, 2007/09/03
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/09/04
- Re: about GNU Hurd,
Xavier Maillard <=
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/05
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/09/05
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Xavier Maillard, 2007/09/03
- Re: about GNU Hurd, olafBuddenhagen, 2007/09/05
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Michael Heath, 2007/09/05
- Re: about GNU Hurd, olafBuddenhagen, 2007/09/06
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/07
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/09/06
- Re: about GNU Hurd, olafBuddenhagen, 2007/09/06
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/07