Re: Font-relative-size

[Han-Wen Nienhuys]

address@hidden writes:
> > the font-relative-size, is it then so that in paper23 frs1 corresponds
> > to 26/23 = 1.13 while in paper16 it corresponds to 20/16 = 1.25...?
> > I could probably make a Scheme Function doing this, but will I be
> > re-inventing the wheel? Have I misunderstood something?
> 
> I think that's the way it works today. An obvious extension would 
> be to be able to specify a relative staff space that matches the 
> relative font sizes.

I think we should change the relative size to be geometrical in
effect, like TeX's magstep, and make staff-symbol obey relative size
as well, (ie. allowing to set staff-space using

   StaffSymbol \override #'relative-staff-space = #-1,

for combining with  #'relative-size = #-1)

   


> 
>      /Mats
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gnu-music-discuss mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-music-discuss

-- 

Han-Wen Nienhuys   |   address@hidden    | http://www.cs.uu.nl/~hanwen/