[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: FW: Professional ???

From: Werner Icking
Subject: Re: FW: Professional ???
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 18:46:08 +0100 (MET)

> From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden>
> Date: 13 Dec 2000 15:47:51 +0100

> [...] I just don't want to see any suggestions
> or advocacy for, or discussions about, non-free softwares packages
> that may fill a particular practical need. 

What is this good for? Do you fear non-free packages?

Imho it should be very welcome if someone can tell that something,
what may be missing in a free package, can be afforded with another
package - free or non-free.

> This is not the place, you
> should take that to another forum, eg,

Composing was only one aspect. Typesetting music was another aspect.

Maybe that I should investigate whether some minor problems on our
ftp-server are caused by having there msuic generated with MusiXTeX,
PMX, M-Tx, MUP, Note Worthy Composer, Score, ... and Lilypond :-(

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]