[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: FW: Professional ???

From: Werner Icking
Subject: Re: FW: Professional ???
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 16:53:15 +0100 (MET)

> From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden>
> Date: 13 Dec 2000 15:47:51 +0100
> Christian Mondrup <address@hidden> writes:
> > of course there is not.  A composer's choice of graphic notation
> > will most often intendedly be more or less open to the performer's
> > interpretation.
> Well, most of the ink that lilypond puts on a page has rather well
> defined musical meaning.  Lilypond is not good at interpreting music
> that is open to speculation.  Otoh, it would be relatively easy to add
> some features to cover arbitrary parts of the sheet with ink.

Does that mean, that Lilypond generates different MIDI-file if
it is feed with the same notes but different composer names?
Or does it react on the year of birth and year of death of the
composer? Or does it typeset dotted eights followed by 1/16th
over 1/8th triplets in another fashion if the music is by
Bach, Beethoven or Goodman?

You are right: Lilypond is not good at interpreting music.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]