[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed
|
From: |
Siddhesh Poyarekar |
|
Subject: |
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed |
|
Date: |
Tue, 25 Feb 2020 10:42:09 +0530 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1 |
On 23/02/20 23:34, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
> Contrary to the members of Manor farm, we welcome anyone and will not
> dismiss your opinion just because you are not a GNU maintainer. This
Wait, I was told that my opinion on matters of GNU governance does not
matter because I am not a GNU maintainer and that was not by the
"members of the Manor farm".
Siddhesh
- Re: lese majeste, (continued)
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Andreas R., 2020/02/22
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Jean Louis, 2020/02/22
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Mike Gerwitz, 2020/02/22
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2020/02/23
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed,
Siddhesh Poyarekar <=
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2020/02/25
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Siddhesh Poyarekar, 2020/02/25
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2020/02/25
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Mark Wielaard, 2020/02/27
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Siddhesh Poyarekar, 2020/02/27
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, siddhesh, 2020/02/27
Message not availableRe: [Hangout - NYLXS] Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Alexandre François Garreau, 2020/02/27
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Jean Louis, 2020/02/22