[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lese majeste
From: |
Alexandre François Garreau |
Subject: |
Re: lese majeste |
Date: |
Mon, 24 Feb 2020 02:57:53 +0100 |
Le dimanche 23 février 2020, 22:01:42 CET Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss) a
écrit :
> Why should anyone be kind and meek in the face of fascists?
Because it weakens your point. Especially on a written medium.
> That's not what our forefathers did.
Not on mailing-lists. World change.
> That e-mail was approved for list redistribution by the moderator in
> spite of using "we". You might be able to convince the moderator that
> it had been a lapse in judgment,
It’s a general “we”, like a “one”.
> If Bob wants to persuade Alice that some situation is detrimental, he
> must present that color, not the raw facts that Alice already knows.
raw facts are hard or rare. color are ubiquitous.
- Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, (continued)
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Ludovic Courtès, 2020/02/22
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Andreas R., 2020/02/22
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Jean Louis, 2020/02/22
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Mike Gerwitz, 2020/02/22
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2020/02/23
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Siddhesh Poyarekar, 2020/02/25
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2020/02/25
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Siddhesh Poyarekar, 2020/02/25