But what will rather happen is that the new generation will just rewrite
another program, possibly without caring about making it free software.
So what? it still can be run. If people value freedom, they should prefer
the free one, to which they could contribute and get live again, if they
need to. But prefering the non-free one is a problem of moral philosophy,
of personal misjugment to prefer not to be free…
There is already non-free software. So the solution is not anything
technical, it is not something positive. We don’t have to “do something
more” to “bring people to write more free softwares”. We have to make
non-free software*disappear*. Stop being written. Stop to be used.
Until the point where, with time, all proprietary software gets lost,
rewritten, useless, unrunnable, or reverse-engineered.