Re: A GNU “social contract”?

[Dmitry Alexandrov]

"Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss)" <936-846-2769@kylheku.com> wrote:
> By the way, "contract" seems like a misnomer
> A statement of promises to behave in some ways toward some group (such as a 
> "community"), who makes no reciprocal promises and isn't a party to the 
> document is rather a "pledge", or "solemn promise" or such

Given that current proposals are actually not statements of promises, but 
statements of _facts_: “GNU is a consistent operating system”, “GNU 
collaborates with the broader free software community”, “GNU welcomes 
contributions from all and everyone”, et cetera; words _“confession of faith”_ 
suit even better.

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature