[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Blowhard Bradley Kuhn and his fraud

From: RJack
Subject: Re: Blowhard Bradley Kuhn and his fraud
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 19:06:21 -0000
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv: Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10

On 6/17/2011 8:55 AM, Hyman Rosen wrote:
On 6/17/2011 8:47 AM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
The contradiction would be if the court would order not to pay
attorney's fees.

Do you believe that at the conclusion of a case, one party pays the
attorney fees of another unless a court instructs them not to do so?
How odd.

How else do you believe a badly losing plaintiff gets a winning
defendant to agree to a stipulated Rule 41 voluntary dismissal "WITH

RJack :)

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]