[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 9th Cir. License Primer
From: |
jellybean stonerfish |
Subject: |
Re: 9th Cir. License Primer |
Date: |
Wed, 30 Mar 2011 02:13:53 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Pan/0.132 (Waxed in Black) |
On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 17:14:11 -0400, RJack wrote:
> The SFLC is eager to cite Second Circuit authority when it suits its
> purposes:
>
<SNIP DATA>
>
> But when it doesn't suit it purpose the SFLC chooses to utterly ignore
> Second Circuit precedent such as:
>
<SNIP DATA>>
>
> The games have begun!
>
> Sincerely,
> RJack :)
That is exactly what a lawyer is supposed to do.
- Re: Blowhard Bradley Kuhn and his fraud, (continued)
- 9th Cir. License Primer, RJack, 2011/03/23
- Re: 9th Cir. License Primer, Alexander Terekhov, 2011/03/24
- Re: 9th Cir. License Primer, RJack, 2011/03/24
- Re: 9th Cir. License Primer, RJack, 2011/03/24
- Re: 9th Cir. License Primer, Alexander Terekhov, 2011/03/24
- Re: 9th Cir. License Primer, RJack, 2011/03/29
- Re: 9th Cir. License Primer,
jellybean stonerfish <=
- Re: 9th Cir. License Primer, Alexander Terekhov, 2011/03/30
- Re: 9th Cir. License Primer, RJack, 2011/03/30
- Re: 9th Cir. License Primer, David Kastrup, 2011/03/30
- Re: 9th Cir. License Primer, RJack, 2011/03/30
- Re: 9th Cir. License Primer, Alexander Terekhov, 2011/03/30
- Re: 9th Cir. License Primer, David Kastrup, 2011/03/30
- Re: 9th Cir. License Primer, Alexander Terekhov, 2011/03/30
- Re: 9th Cir. License Primer, David Kastrup, 2011/03/30
- Re: 9th Cir. License Primer, RJack, 2011/03/30