[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Utterly imbecile pinky communist Ninth Circuit 'judges' (Vernorscan
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: Utterly imbecile pinky communist Ninth Circuit 'judges' (Vernorscandalous ruling) |
Date: |
Thu, 03 Feb 2011 17:24:35 +0100 |
RJack wrote:
[...]
> All this ruling really says, is that Hoops as a counter-claimant has the
> status of a plaintiff (not defendant) and carries the burden of proof
> and must plead facts to establish ownership of the copies in order to
> defeat a Motion to Dismiss.
I disagree. The court ruled:
"Hoops avers that it resold Adobe products it purchased from third
party intermediary distributors, Hoops Countercl. ¶ 8, but offers no
facts regarding under what terms these distributors obtained the
copies."
Some time ago I bought a BMW car from a nearby dealer. The car includes
tons of software and I even patched some of it (navigation computer
software originating from http://www.navteq.com/ GPS stuff). Patching
aside, I have no idea regarding "what terms these distributors obtained
the copies" of the software in my BMW car. And now I'm being told that I
can not sell my BMW car without permission from bmw.com if I live in
California... Luckily I don't live in the Ninth Circuit...
regards,
alexander.
--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards
too, whereas GNU cannot.)