Re: Blowhard Bradley Kuhn and his fraud

[Hyman Rosen]

On 11/30/2010 2:46 AM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> First ever official court denials against Bradley Kuhn
> http://www.terekhov.de/159.pdf

Pretty weak sauce:
    To the extent Plaintiffs are arguing that CMA or WD is
    guilty of copyright infringement through its own use
    of the Infringing Assets, Plaintiffs may amend the
    Complaint to plead facts specific to CMA or WD's alleged
    infringing activity.
    ...
    For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs' motion to join
    respondents is denied as to CMA. Plaintiffs' motion to
    join WD is denied, without prejudice, subject to
    Plaintiffs' decision to refile following an evidentiary
    hearing on the issues ofwhether the asset sale amounted
    to a merger between WDE and WD and whether WD substantially
    continued WDE's business.

The denials have to do with the details of bankrupt companies
selling off assets, and have nothing to do with the copyright
arguments.