[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Big blow to proprietary linking nonsense.
From: |
Hyman Rosen |
Subject: |
Re: Big blow to proprietary linking nonsense. |
Date: |
Wed, 08 Dec 2010 15:56:10 -0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0 |
On 5/18/2010 4:19 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Hyman Rosen wrote:
so anyone who does so without honoring the terms of the
GPL will have the terms of copyright infringement legally
enforced against them.
When was that done in a United States court?
So far, the SFLC has brought several enforcement measures
against copyright infringers of GPL-covered works, and in
every concluded case the defendants have agreed to comply
with the GPL. We have yet to see such a case carried to
judgment, since it's likely that the infringement was due
to carelessness or laziness. We may in fact never see such
a full case, since real companies have lawyers who advise
them against foolishness, while cranks like Daniel Wallace
are incapable of coherence.
- Re: The great BusyBox fraud continues, (continued)
- Re: The great BusyBox fraud continues, Hyman Rosen, 2010/12/08
- Re: The great BusyBox fraud continues, RJack, 2010/12/08
- Message not available
- Re: The great BusyBox fraud continues, RJack, 2010/12/08
- Re: The great BusyBox fraud continues, Hyman Rosen, 2010/12/08
- Message not available
- Re: The SFLC and May 20 , 2010 Summary Judgment conference, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/12/08
- Re: Big blow to proprietary linking nonsense., Hyman Rosen, 2010/12/08
- Message not available
- Re: Big blow to proprietary linking nonsense.,
Hyman Rosen <=
- Re: Big blow to proprietary linking nonsense., Alexander Terekhov, 2010/12/08
- Re: Big blow to proprietary linking nonsense., Rex Ballard, 2010/12/08
- Re: Big blow to proprietary linking nonsense., RJack, 2010/12/08
Re: Big blow to GPL linking nonsense., Hyman Rosen, 2010/12/08
Re: Big blow to GPL linking nonsense., Rex Ballard, 2010/12/08