|
| From: | Hyman Rosen |
| Subject: | Re: SFLC stipulated dismissal of Comtrend without any settlement |
| Date: | Tue, 04 May 2010 16:13:52 -0000 |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0 |
On 4/12/2010 12:02 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
I should think that it is sufficient if enough protected material from the registered version can be found in the distribution, whether or not there is an exact version match.
The SimplexGrinnell case seems to imply otherwise. The court really wanted each version to be registered. I don't know whether that case serves as precedent for this one. Maybe RJack can tell us, since he's so good at claiming that the CAFC JMRI decision doesn't.
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |