Re: SFLC stipulated dismissal of Comtrend without any settlement

[RJack]

Hyman Rosen wrote:
> On 4/12/2010 7:45 AM, RJack wrote:
> > It claims infringement of "BusyBox v. 0.60.3" causes the problem. 
> > Who are people going to believe? You or their lyin' eyes?
>
> The SFLC does not claim that BusyBox v. 0.60.3 causes the 
> infringement problem. This can easily be seen by reading the 
> complaint, 
> <http://www.softwarefreedom.org/resources/2009/busybox-complaint-2009-12-14.pdf>.
>
>
>
> Since you continue to state something that is obviously untrue, as 
> can be seen in the document, it is you who is lying.

Nope. You are lying about lying.

The SFLC claims infringement of "BusyBox v. 0.60.3" causes the problem.
Who are people going to believe? You or their lyin' eyes? If you
continue to moooooooooooooooooooooove the goalposts far enough they'll
eventually come back around and bite you in the ass from behind. ROFL.

Rush Limbaugh and Hyman Rosen are big fat liars! Also, my dog can whip
your dog.

Sincerely,
RJack :)