|
From: | RJack |
Subject: | Re: Compliance detection tool |
Date: | Tue, 20 Apr 2010 13:25:05 -0400 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) |
Hyman Rosen wrote:
On 4/20/2010 9:31 AM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:With one courtAnd how many court decisions have supported the crank point of view while addressing open licenses?
Absolutely none. Nada. Zip. Nicht. There is *no* legal definition of what an "open" license is, other than the legal certainty that *all* copyright licenses are contracts to be interpreted under the state law of contracts. There is absolutely no legal difference between "open" and "proprietary" copyright licenses. The same rules of contract construction apply uniformly to both. Sincerely, RJack :)
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |