Re: SFLC stipulated dismissal of Comtrend without any settlement

[RJack]

Hyman Rosen wrote:
> On 4/13/2010 1:25 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> > I'm just curious, what "automatically terminate" does 
> > http://www.softwarefreedom.org/resources/2009/busybox-complaint-2009-12-14.pdf
> >
> >
> > then talking about, in your view, oh paragon of GNUtardiness dak?
>
> What it says: 
> <http://www.softwarefreedom.org/resources/2009/busybox-complaint-2009-12-14.pdf>
>
>
> Thus, once each Defendant made a distribution that did not comply
> with the License, that Defendant lost any and all right to copy,
> modify, or distribute BusyBox. Any copying, modification, or
> distribution of BusyBox after that time by each Defendant was and is
> without Plaintiffs' permission.

Since you and DAK are incapable of understanding the meaning and
operation of a "condition precedent" as used in copyright contracts,
you will forever remain confused concerning licensing fundamentals.

Sincerely,
RJack :)