Re: SFLC stipulated dismissal of Comtrend without any settlement

[David Kastrup]

Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:

> Hyman Rosen wrote:
>> 
>> On 4/12/2010 4:39 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
>> > the claim is of copyright/tort, not license/contract.
>> 
>> The claim is for copyright infringement.
>
> Copyright infringement is a tort you idiot. Note that SFLC's claim of
> copyright infringement is baseless and frivolous:
>
> "Defendant denies that Mr. Anderson is the author or developer of the
> BusyBox computer program, and the owner of the copyright in that
> computer program. "

Well, if things are clear like that, we'll have the case thrown out of
court without defendants getting into compliance, in no time at all.

Really, you _have_ to stop confusing either party's claims with the
verdict.

-- 
David Kastrup