Re: SFLC stipulated dismissal of Comtrend without any settlement

[RJack]

Hyman Rosen wrote:
> On 4/9/2010 4:32 PM, RJack wrote:
> > Don't go to a real court Hyman. You'll find the court won't indulge
> >  your denials anymore than the federal courts listened to the 
> > Birther's claims of non-citizenship for Obama. ROFL.
>
> According to this paper, 
> <http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Fall_2006.pdf>
>
>
>
> estoppel claims could in fact apply to GPL cases, but in the opposite
>  way than anti-GPL cranks hope. A distributor of code under the GPL 
> who asserts patent rights to prevent an invention embodied in the 
> code from being practiced could have estoppel claimed against him.
>
> According to this paper, <http://www.sapnakumar.org/EnfGPL.pdf> the 
> GPL is not a contract.

The GPL "might" also prevent unwanted pregnancies in China as well as
cure breast cancer worldwide. I wonder what the odds are.

Sincerely,
RJack :)