Re: SFLC stipulated dismissal of Comtrend without any settlement

[RJack]

Hyman Rosen wrote:
> On 4/8/2010 3:18 PM, RJack wrote:
> > Post a verifiable settlement agreement or admit the SFLC cut and 
> > ran.
>
> It is not necessary to "post a verifiable settlement agreement" and 
> it is probably impossible to do so, since settlements are often kept 
> private. It is only necessary to see that the SFLC demands compliance
>  with the GPL, and that such compliance exists once the suit ends. 
> That will be true of Comtrend once they get their broken links fixed,
>  just as it has been true with every other defendant with whom the 
> SFLC has settled.

Keep spinnin' Hyman -- just keep on spinnin' Bunky -- maybe somebody
will eventually believe you.

*When* they fix the broken link, will it point to the source code for
"BusyBox, v.0.60.3" as claimed in their frivolous lawsuit?

ROFL

Sincerely,
RJack :)