Re: Recommendation for a CL data structures library

[RJack]

Hyman Rosen wrote:
> On 4/3/2010 8:00 AM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> > http://www.terekhov.de/Wallace_v_FSF_37.pdf "as is evident on the 
> > face of the agreement itself ... the GPL, which is the target of 
> > Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, is a software licensing agreement 
> > ... "[T]o the extent that the terms of an attached contract 
> > conflict with the allegations of the complaint, the contract 
> > controls." Centers v. Centennial Mortg., Inc., 398 F.3d 930, 933 
> > (7th Cir. 2005)"
[...]
> The quote about contracts merely reinforces the fact that the court 
> can read the GPL for itself, and not rely on cranks who misinterpret
>  it.

Thanks for removing solipsistic deniers like yourself from the picture.

> It does not imply that the GPL is a contract.

Denial through solipsism is unfalsifiable and unassailable through
rational argument. Stick to solipsism and you shall forever prevail
Hyman. Construct for yourself a comfortable cocoon. If truth dares to
intrude into your GNU World just deeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeny it.

Sincerely,
RJack :)