|
| From: | Hyman Rosen |
| Subject: | Re: Shoplifting, concealment, liability presumption |
| Date: | Tue, 04 May 2010 16:08:17 -0000 |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0 |
On 3/10/2010 11:18 AM, RJack wrote:
Sigh... That's nothing new. If conditions precedent are not satisfied in a proprietary license the same thing results. The Artistic license had no conditions precedent -- only covenants. One erroneous decision by a non-precedental court is hardly a victory. The CAFC's clear error can never harm anyone other than Katzer.
It's only an error when a court superior to CAFC declares it such. Until then, it stands.
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |