[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Settlements

From: Alexander Terekhov
Subject: Re: Settlements
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2010 18:20:44 +0100

David Kastrup wrote:
> Alexander Terekhov <> writes:
> > David Kastrup wrote:
> > [...]
> >> Taking something in a supermarket without paying constitutes theft.  The
> >> relevant activity of the theft is done at the time I take the ware, the
> >> status of the theft is established when I pass the cash register.
> >
> > Uh stupid dak. You're mistaken.
> >
> >
> We have other actions establishing the intent of the persons here.  But
> anyway, you'll notice that only the "Anwalt" talks about complete theft,
> while the only relevant opinion is that of the court, and the court does
> not talk about theft in its description of the complaint, but "the
> taking of a non-own moveable object from somebody else with the intent
> of making it his own against the law".

Uh moron dak.


P.S. "I'm insufficiently motivated to go set up a GNU/Linux system 
so that I can do the builds."

Hyman Rosen <> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate'

P.P.S. "Of course correlation implies causation! Without this 
fundamental principle, no science would ever make any progress."

Hyman Rosen <> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate'

(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can 
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards 
too, whereas GNU cannot.)

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]