[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Settlements
From: |
Hyman Rosen |
Subject: |
Re: Settlements |
Date: |
Fri, 26 Feb 2010 09:09:26 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0 |
On 2/26/2010 6:47 AM, RJack wrote:
Let's hope the SFLC doesn't file voluntary dismissals and cut and run
once again.
In each of the cases that the SFLC filed, the defendants came into
compliance with the GPL once the cases ended. While anti-GPL cranks
might like to characterize this as "cutting and running", outcomes
which match goals are normally classified as "victories".
The GPL needs a good review by a federal judge.
There's not much to review there. It's just a copyright license.
> It's obvious
We'll just wait and see then.
- Re: Settlements, (continued)
- Re: Settlements, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/26
- Re: Settlements, RJack, 2010/02/26
- Re: Settlements, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/26
- Re: Settlements, RJack, 2010/02/26
- Re: Settlements, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/28
- Re: Settlements, David Kastrup, 2010/02/27
- Re: Settlements, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/27
- Re: Settlements, David Kastrup, 2010/02/27
- Re: Settlements, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/27
- Re: Settlements, David Kastrup, 2010/02/27
- Re: Settlements,
Hyman Rosen <=
- Re: Settlements, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/26
- Re: Settlements, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/26
- Re: Settlements, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/26
- Re: Settlements, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/26
- Re: Settlements, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/26
- Re: Settlements, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/26