[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 17:25:14 +0100 |
Hyman Rosen wrote:
[...]
> That is because there are special laws that pertain to
> apartment rentals and evictions, not because of any
> general principle.
Forget apartments for a moment silly Hyman. If you rent a car on a
monthly fee basis and don't pay on time while using it, that DOESN'T
make you liable in tort (for theft). Surprised, silly Hyman?
regards,
alexander.
P.S. "I'm insufficiently motivated to go set up a GNU/Linux system
so that I can do the builds."
Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate'
P.P.S. "Of course correlation implies causation! Without this
fundamental principle, no science would ever make any progress."
Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate'
--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards
too, whereas GNU cannot.)
- Re: Hey Mackenzie, please help comrade dak grok the following as well, (continued)
- Re: Hey Mackenzie, please help comrade dak grok the following as well, David Kastrup, 2010/02/23
- Re: Hey Alan, please help comrade dak grok the following, David Kastrup, 2010/02/23
- Re: Hey Alan, please help comrade dak grok the following, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/23
- Re: Hey Alan, please help comrade dak grok the following, David Kastrup, 2010/02/23
- Re: Hey Alan, please help comrade dak grok the following, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/23
- Re: Hey Alan, please help comrade dak grok the following, David Kastrup, 2010/02/23
- Re: Hey Alan, please help comrade dak grok the following, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/23
- Re: Hey Alan, please help comrade dak grok the following, David Kastrup, 2010/02/23
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/23
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, David Kastrup, 2010/02/23
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/23
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, RJack, 2010/02/23
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/23
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/23
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/23
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/23
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, RJack, 2010/02/23
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/23
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, John Hasler, 2010/02/23
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, David Kastrup, 2010/02/23